We scope the work, configure Cowork against your real files and tools, build the connectors and skills your workflows need, and train your team to run it.
Claude Cowork is Anthropic's agentic workspace, where Claude works on your actual files, tools and accounts instead of only answering questions in a chat window. You give it a task, it does the work across the connected tools, and it reports back with the finished thing. For a business the practical difference is that it produces the deliverable rather than describing how to make one.
Cowork ships as a blank workspace, which is the right decision from Anthropic and the reason most teams stall in week two. The licence gives you the capability, and the value only shows up once it is pointed at your files, connected to the tools you already pay for, taught the way your business actually names and files things, and bounded so nobody worries about what it might touch.
That configuration work is the whole job. We do it as a done-for-you engagement, because a team of 10 to 100 people rarely has someone free to spend three weeks learning connector scopes and skill files before the first useful output appears.
We sit with the people doing the repetitive work and write down what actually consumes their hours, then pick the two or three tasks where an AI coworker changes the week rather than the day.
Google Workspace, Slack, your CRM, your drive, your database, whatever the work already lives in. Each connector is scoped deliberately, so Cowork reaches the accounts and folders it needs and nothing beyond them.
We write the configuration and the skill files that hold your naming conventions, your templates, your tone and your rules, because a coworker that does not know how your business files a proposal will produce a generic one.
Each recurring task becomes a repeatable instruction the team can trigger by name, tested against your real historical work until the output is something you would send without rewriting it.
Sending, deleting and anything else with consequences sits behind a human approval step by default, and we document what is automatic and what waits for a person.
A live session with the people who will use it daily, a written runbook, and a month of monitoring while the habits form. You own the setup at the end.
The same workspace looks different depending on who is holding it, so we scope per role rather than per department.
Client onboarding packets, recurring reports pulled from several tools at once, data moved between systems that were never meant to talk, and the weekly admin that quietly eats a day.
Invoice preparation, expense categorisation against your own chart of accounts, reconciliation prep, and the monthly pack assembled from the same sources every time.
Research before a call, CRM notes written from the actual conversation, proposals drafted from your real templates, and follow-ups drafted in your voice for a person to approve.
Content repurposed across channels, campaign reporting assembled from the platforms, briefs written against your brand rules, and the asset production that normally waits on one person.
Job descriptions from your own past hires, candidate screening summaries, onboarding checklists per role, and the document handling that arrives in bursts.
The inbox triage, the meeting follow-through, the reporting you keep meaning to build, and the work that only exists because nobody else has the context to do it.
Cost depends on scope rather than headcount. A single automated workflow is a small fixed project, and a full operations build with several agents is larger. We scope each engagement against the hours the work consumes today and give you a fixed price before anything starts, so you are comparing it against a real number rather than an hourly estimate.
You get that number on the first call rather than after a paid discovery phase, and your Anthropic subscription is billed separately by Anthropic.
Book a callYes. Automathiq deploys Claude Cowork as a done-for-you service for small and mid-size businesses. We scope which recurring tasks suit an AI coworker, configure Cowork against your real files and tools, build the connectors and skills your workflows need, set the permissions, and train your team. You get a working setup rather than a licence and a blank screen.
Cost depends on scope rather than headcount. A single automated workflow is a small fixed project, and a full operations build with several agents is larger. We scope each engagement against the hours the work consumes today and give you a fixed price before anything starts, so you are comparing it against a real number rather than an hourly estimate. Your Anthropic subscription is billed separately by Anthropic.
The first working workflow is usually live in two to three weeks. Scoping and access take the first week, configuration and connectors the second, and the training session lands once there is something real to train on. Additional workflows are added one at a time after that, so the team adopts each one before the next arrives.
Only what you connect. Access is scoped per workspace and per connector, so Cowork sees the folders, inboxes and accounts you deliberately grant and nothing else. We set those boundaries during configuration, document them, and keep destructive actions such as sending or deleting behind a human approval step by default.
No. Claude Code is the terminal tool developers use to work on codebases. Claude Cowork is the workspace where non-technical teams hand Claude real tasks across their files and connected tools. We deploy both, and most small business engagements start with Cowork because it reaches the operations and admin work first.
Yes. Automathiq operates from Mexico City and delivers in Spanish and English, so the configuration, the runbook and the training session all happen in whichever language your team actually works in.
Thirty minutes on a call is usually enough to say which of your recurring tasks Cowork can take, and which ones it cannot.
Book a call